Analyze nestle csr initiative plan focuses on society issues
This is a CSR project, and choose to nestle as our company Note: Please give answer on mentioned words (must add intext citation) and required
Assignment –
Overview – Develop research-based guidelines for neutral and fair public debates and media coverage, in your role as a consultant, to ensure that voters make up their own minds as free of social influence as possible.
The concepts and principles of social perception, social interaction, and social influence can be applied to any social or professional setting.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 1: Analyze methods and principles of social psychology and their application to important social phenomena in contemporary society.
Competency 3: Synthesize social psychological theory and research to generate new understandings of social phenomena in contemporary society.
Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the psychological professions.
Questions to Consider –
To deepen your understanding, you are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of the business community.
Social Psychology and Science
Assessment Instructions –
Preparation – Use the Capella Library and the Internet to research theories of social psychology and strategies for minimizing social influence in political debates. Some suggestions for keyword searches include (but are not limited to): debate format analysis; moderator influence; the impact of social and mainstream media; self-presentation and visual influence; minimizing bias; presentation style, and voter perception.
The authentic deliverable for this assessment is a proposal with an executive summary. There are many resources on the Internet and free templates or examples, if you choose to use one as a guide for completing this assessment. This assessment is also an exercise in disciplined professional writing. Carefully parsing down information to maximize conveyance of knowledge with the minimum of space is as rigorous as writing an academic paper.
Instructions – Assume the role described in the following scenario as you complete this assessment.
Scenario – You are a political consultant to a “better government” citizen group, such as the League of Women Voters. You have been hired to develop guidelines for holding neutral and fair public town hall-style debates, covered by social and mainstream media, to ensure that the voters make up their own minds as free of social influence as possible.
Deliverable – Develop a proposal of research-based guidelines for neutral and fair public debates and media coverage. The first part of the proposal is an executive summary, which should be about one page in length.
The Executive Summary – Writing must be succinct, clear, and comprehensible to a layperson. The purpose of the executive summary is to:
The first two subheadings constitute the executive summary portion of your proposal:
Analysis of the Issue: Social Influence and Politics
Analysis of the Issue: Perception and Bias
Proposed Guidelines
Write research-based guidelines for fair public debates and media coverage.
Guidelines for Fair Public Debate
Integrate principles of social psychology and research to develop guidelines for fair public debate.
Consider the following guiding questions as you develop the guidelines.
Consider the implications of visuals and voter perception.
References –
Support positions with references from scholarly and professional literature.
Support each guideline with at least one reference using APA format and style.
Additional Requirements – Length: Maximum length is 3-4 pages. References: Your references may include both scholarly literature and practitioner sources. Support each guideline with at least one current reference.
Attachment:- Assignment File.rar