Assignment Detail

Tutors

Difference in implied-in-law and implied-in-fact contract

    Assignment Instructions

    Assignment ID: FG132433169

    Apply: The Use of Contracts to Protect Property Rights

    Assignment Content

    Read the “Summary of the Wrench LLC v. Taco Bell Corporation case” It is suggested that you also research and read the full court opinion, to aid your understanding of the legal issues presented.

    Read the “WHAT IS EXPRESS AND IMPLIED-IN-FACT CONTRACT AND QUASI CONTRACT”

    Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper using Microsoft® Word. Address the following questions:

    1. What type of intellectual property was at issue in this case? Were these ideas entitled to protection under the law?

    2. Explain the difference between an implied-in-law (quasi contract) and an implied-in-fact contract. What type of contract was at issue in this case?

    3. Explain what the parties could have done differently to protect their rights and avoid this dispute.

    4. Explain how a properly written contract could have been utilized for the licensing and use of the intellectual property to prevent the issue, and provide terms you would recommend being included in such a contract.

    5. Identify and explain each of the elements that would have been necessary to form a valid contract.

    Attachment:- Summary of WrenchLLCv. Taco Bell Corporation.rar

    Attachment:- Express and Implied-in-Fact Contracts.rar

    Need fresh solution to this Assignment without plagiarism?? Get Quote Now

    Expert Answer

    Asked by: Anonymous
    Plagiarism Checked
    Answer Rating:
    4.6/5

    Plagiarism free Answer files are strictly restricted for download to the student who originally posted this question.

    Related Assignments

    //
    Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. You can send Assignments directly to support team.
    👋 Hi, how can I help?